Maryland University President Faces Plagiarism Review, Admits to Using ‘Recurrent Language’

University of Maryland President Darryll Pines is under fire after allegations of plagiarism in his academic work surfaced, forcing him to submit to an internal investigation. This comes after The Daily Wire revealed that Pines had copied extensive portions of a 2002 research paper from an online tutorial, without citation. Despite his denial of any serious misconduct, Pines has asked the university to conduct an "impartial review."

In a university-wide email, Pines admitted to what he called "recurrent language" in his papers, but stopped short of acknowledging plagiarism. "While I do not believe there is merit to these claims, an impartial review is in the best interest of the university," Pines wrote, adding that the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) would oversee the investigation.

The situation raises significant concerns about academic integrity. Pines’ 2002 paper reportedly included a 1,500-word section nearly one-third of the document directly copied from a tutorial website created by an Australian student in 1996. Pines then reused the same section in another paper published in 2006. The only modification made was altering some British spellings to American ones.

Here are the key issues at hand:

• 1,500 words verbatim: The Daily Wire uncovered that a massive section of Pines’ paper was lifted without attribution.

• Repeat offense: Pines and his co-author used the exact same material in another paper published four years later.

• Academic outrage: Scholars have expressed shock, rejecting the defense that the text was simply "customary or common language." No reputable academic would excuse such a blatant use of uncredited material.

Many academics are appalled by the defense mounted by Pines’ spokeswoman, who dismissed the copied text as inconsequential. The implications for students are troubling, as several have voiced concerns that if Pines is not held accountable, it could undermine academic honesty policies at the university.

The fallout has not been limited to campus. SPIE, the engineering society that published the 2002 paper, released a statement condemning plagiarism in any form as a "serious breach of professional conduct." Meanwhile, Jonathan Bailey, a plagiarism expert, acknowledged that the evidence against Pines was compelling, noting "whole sections of the paper that are near verbatim or verbatim."

However, attempts to deflect criticism have emerged, with some suggesting that The Daily Wire’s conservative stance is the real issue, not the plagiarism. This distraction, however, fails to address the core problem: a university president accused of violating basic academic principles.

Pines has faced scrutiny before. Earlier this year, he was caught passing off ChatGPT-generated content as original faculty work. The question now is whether this latest scandal will lead to serious consequences or if it will be swept under the rug due to ideological sympathies.

Universities should be held to the highest standards of honesty, regardless of who holds the title of president. If leaders like Pines are not held accountable, the message it sends to students and faculty alike is clear: rules are flexible for those at the top.

It's time for real accountability, and the results of the ORI investigation will determine whether the University of Maryland will stand by its principles or cave to political expediency.

Share this story or subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed on this and other important issues.