- Conservative Fix
- Posts
- Scott Bessent Warns Iran Responds to ‘Brute Force’ Amid Trump’s Nuclear Deliberations
Scott Bessent Warns Iran Responds to ‘Brute Force’ Amid Trump’s Nuclear Deliberations
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says Iran only responds to strength as nuclear negotiations stall and U.S. pressure intensifies.

Iran’s leaders are once again testing American resolve and this time, the White House is making it clear that weakness is not on the table.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said this week that Iran understands only “brute force,” signaling that President Donald Trump is prepared to escalate pressure as nuclear negotiations remain at a standstill. With tensions rising and military assets repositioned in the region, the stakes couldn’t be higher.
Appearing on national television, Bessent emphasized that the administration is continuing its “maximum pressure” campaign against the Iranian regime. That pressure spans multiple fronts:
Aggressive economic sanctions through the Treasury Department
Diplomatic coordination with allies, including Israel
Strategic military positioning in the region
Bessent noted that he was directed by President Trump last March to intensify sanctions enforcement, targeting Iranian financial networks and leadership assets. According to the Treasury secretary, the strategy has already “worked” by restricting the regime’s access to global capital.
Sanctions have historically proven powerful. During Trump’s first term, Iran’s oil exports reportedly plummeted by more than 80%, and the country’s currency lost significant value. Iran’s GDP contracted sharply during peak sanction periods, underscoring how financial pressure can destabilize the regime’s ambitions.
The comments came after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with President Trump at the White House for detailed discussions. While Trump later said “nothing definitive” had been reached, he made clear that negotiations remain the preferred path but not the only one.
The president referenced last summer’s Operation Midnight Hammer, a U.S. strike that severely damaged Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump warned that if Iran once again refuses to negotiate in good faith, consequences would follow.
“If it cannot [be consummated], we will just have to see what the outcome will be,” Trump wrote after the meeting.
The message was unmistakable: diplomacy is available, but deterrence remains active.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has rejected U.S. demands to dismantle both nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Tehran insists its missile capabilities are non-negotiable.
That refusal puts the regime at odds with long-standing U.S. national security priorities. Iran continues to enrich uranium at levels far beyond what is needed for civilian energy use. International watchdogs have warned that enrichment levels approaching weapons-grade capability significantly shorten the “breakout time” needed to produce a nuclear weapon.
Meanwhile, Iran’s ballistic missile program remains one of the largest in the Middle East, posing threats not only to Israel but to U.S. forces and allies throughout the region.
When asked whether Trump might authorize action similar to Operation Midnight Hammer, Bessent stopped short of previewing specific plans. However, he confirmed that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the president are repositioning military assets and evaluating options.
That approach reflects a broader doctrine: negotiate from strength.
In recent years, global instability has surged. Defense analysts note that U.S. adversaries including Iran, China, and Russia have tested Western resolve amid perceived weakness. Strong deterrence, backed by credible military capability, has historically reduced the likelihood of open conflict.
Bessent also indicated that the Treasury Department is closely tracking Iranian leadership finances and overseas assets. If necessary, he said, those funds could be targeted or recovered for the benefit of the Iranian people.
According to Bessent, President Trump believes Operation Midnight Hammer significantly improved America’s leverage. By damaging key nuclear infrastructure, the administration sent a signal that delays and defiance carry consequences.
Polling consistently shows that a majority of Americans oppose Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. National security remains a top voter concern, particularly as conflicts continue to simmer across the Middle East.
The question now is whether Tehran recalculates or continues down a path of confrontation.
For now, the administration’s posture is clear economic force, military readiness, and diplomatic pressure working in tandem.
Iran has a choice to make.
If you support strong American leadership on national security, share this article and subscribe to our newsletter for more updates.