Trump Denies Iran War Rift With General Caine

President Donald Trump forcefully rejected a report suggesting a rift between himself and General Daniel “Razin” Caine over potential military action against Iran, calling the claims “100% incorrect” and accusing the media of manufacturing division.

The pushback comes after a report claimed that Caine had raised concerns about extended war plans targeting Iran. Trump responded directly, insisting that his top military adviser is fully aligned with him.

“The story does not attribute this vast wealth of knowledge to anyone, and is 100% incorrect,” Trump said. “General Caine, like all of us, would like not to see War but, if a decision is made on going against Iran at a Military level, it is his opinion that it will be something easily won.”

The article suggested that Pentagon leaders were wary of a prolonged military campaign against Iran, citing potential risks:

• Depletion of munitions stockpiles

• Strain on U.S. forces

• Complications in protecting regional allies

• Possible impact on future contingencies involving China

According to the report, options under consideration ranged from limited strikes to a broader multi-day aerial campaign.

Officials reportedly expressed concern that a longer engagement could leave the United States exposed in other theaters if critical air-defense systems and precision munitions were heavily expended.

Trump dismissed the narrative of disagreement, emphasizing that he is the final decision-maker and that Caine would execute any lawful order.

“He only knows one thing, how to WIN and, if he is told to do so, he will be leading the pack,” Trump said.

The president also referenced “Midnight Hammer,” a prior strike targeting Iranian nuclear development facilities, which he said were “blown to smithereens by our Great B-2 Bombers.”

Trump reiterated that he would prefer a negotiated agreement but warned that failure to reach a deal would bring severe consequences.

“I would rather have a Deal than not but, if we don’t make a Deal, it will be a very bad day for that Country,” he said.

The United States has significantly increased its military presence in the Middle East in recent weeks. Defense analysts note that the current deployment including naval strike groups and long-range bomber assets is among the largest U.S. force concentrations in the region since 2003.

Such force buildups often serve dual purposes:

• Deterrence signaling

• Preparation for rapid strike capability

• Reassurance to regional partners

While the president has not announced a final decision, he has repeatedly stated that “all options remain on the table.”

The White House reinforced Trump’s statement, saying General Caine provides professional military advice while the president retains ultimate authority.

“General Caine is a highly respected professional whose job requires providing unbiased information to the Commander in Chief,” a White House spokesperson said. “President Trump listens to feedback from all members of his national security team, and he is always the final decision maker.”

The episode underscores the intense scrutiny surrounding U.S. policy toward Iran, particularly as tensions remain elevated over regional security and nuclear concerns.

For now, Trump is making clear that there is no daylight between him and his top general and that the final call rests squarely in the Oval Office.

For continued coverage on U.S. national security and Middle East policy, share this article or subscribe to our newsletter for updates.