Trump Set for China Trip in March With Trade Tariffs in Spotlight

President Donald Trump is heading to Beijing at a pivotal moment and the timing could hardly be more dramatic.

The White House confirmed that Trump will travel to China from March 31 to April 2 for talks with President Xi Jinping, marking the first in-person meeting between the two leaders since October. But just as the trip was announced, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a major pillar of Trump’s tariff strategy, reshaping the trade landscape days before the summit.

The Court ruled that Trump overstepped his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) when he imposed 20% tariffs on Chinese imports tied to national emergency declarations involving fentanyl trafficking and trade imbalances.

Those tariffs are now invalidated.

However, other China-focused duties remain intact including tariffs implemented under Section 301 and Section 232 trade authorities. Those mechanisms, authorized by Congress, are considered legally more durable and continue to cover hundreds of billions of dollars in Chinese goods.

Trump responded quickly, announcing he would impose a new 10% global tariff for 150 days while evaluating next steps.

The ruling represents a significant setback in the broader trade war Trump reignited after returning to office in January 2025. Since then, tariffs have been a central tool of his economic and foreign policy strategy.

Trump and Xi are expected to focus on extending a fragile trade truce reached in October. That agreement paused further tariff hikes and included commitments from Beijing to crack down on illicit fentanyl exports and loosen restrictions on critical mineral exports.

The United States imported approximately $427 billion worth of goods from China in 2023, while exporting roughly $148 billion a trade imbalance that has long been a Trump talking point. He has repeatedly argued that persistent deficits weaken American manufacturing and national security.

China, for its part, has leveraged its dominance in rare earth minerals which account for nearly 70% of global production as strategic leverage. Beijing has signaled it could tighten exports if tensions escalate.

Analysts say the Supreme Court ruling may embolden Chinese negotiators.

“Unlike with many other countries, there is a well-established, much more legally durable mechanism for most of the tariffs on China,” noted Martin Chorzempa of the Peterson Institute. That reality could cushion Beijing from some fallout while complicating Trump’s negotiating posture.

Beyond tariffs, sensitive issues loom large.

China views Taiwan as part of its territory, while the United States continues to provide the island with defensive arms under U.S. law. In December, Washington approved an $11.1 billion arms package for Taiwan the largest ever heightening Beijing’s frustration.

Xi also raised concerns over U.S. arms sales during a recent call with Trump.

Meanwhile, U.S. farmers are watching closely. China is the world’s largest soybean consumer and a crucial market for American agricultural exports. Trump said Xi indicated openness to increasing soybean purchases a potential political win for the president’s rural base. But analysts caution that Beijing may rethink major agricultural commitments following the court’s tariff ruling.

Trump last traveled to China in 2017. This visit carries even greater weight, coming amid:

• A volatile global trade environment

• Rising tensions over Taiwan

• Supply chain realignment efforts

• Pressure from allies frustrated by broad U.S. tariffs

Since taking office again, Trump has pursued tariffs not only against China but against a range of trading partners, arguing that aggressive leverage is necessary to restore fairness.

Critics say the global tariff push has strained alliances and inadvertently insulated Beijing by targeting multiple countries at once.

Now, as Trump heads to Beijing, the balance of leverage is shifting. The Supreme Court ruling limits one of his emergency tools, but durable tariff authorities remain. Whether that weakens or clarifies America’s negotiating position remains to be seen.

One thing is certain: the March summit will shape the trajectory of the world’s two largest economies and the future of the global trade war.

For more analysis on U.S.-China trade and global markets, share this article or subscribe to our newsletter for updates.