Insurrection Trial Ends with Guilty Verdict for Former President Yoon Suk Yeol

In a stunning turn of events, a South Korean court has sentenced former President Yoon Suk Yeol to life in prison after finding him guilty of masterminding an insurrection tied to his brief declaration of martial law in December 2024.

The ruling marks one of the most consequential political trials in modern South Korean history, underscoring the country’s strict constitutional boundaries around executive power.

Yoon’s declaration of emergency martial law lasted roughly six hours before the National Assembly voted it down amid massive street protests. What he described as a necessary warning against obstruction by opposition parties quickly escalated into a constitutional crisis.

Prosecutors argued that the move was not only unconstitutional but a direct assault on South Korea’s democratic system.

In January, they stated that Yoon’s actions “undermined the function of the National Assembly and the Election Commission” and effectively sought to dismantle the liberal democratic constitutional order.

The court agreed, convicting Yoon of:

• Masterminding an insurrection

• Abuse of authority

Under South Korean law, insurrection carries a maximum penalty of death or life imprisonment. Prosecutors had sought the death penalty, but the court imposed a life sentence instead.

Although capital punishment remains legal in South Korea, the country has not carried out an execution since 1997. The last death sentence was handed down in 2016, but it was not carried out.

Yoon, 65, denied wrongdoing throughout the trial. He maintained that, as president, he had constitutional authority to declare martial law and insisted his action was intended to “sound the alarm” over political gridlock.

His legal team is expected to file an appeal.

This life sentence is not Yoon’s only legal challenge. Last month, he received a separate five-year prison term on charges including obstructing authorities’ attempts to arrest him following the martial law declaration. That sentence is also under appeal.

In total, Yoon faces eight ongoing trial proceedings, making him one of the most legally embattled former leaders in South Korean history.

The conviction places him alongside a small but notable list of South Korean presidents who have faced serious criminal penalties after leaving office. In recent decades, multiple former leaders have been imprisoned on corruption or abuse-of-power charges, reflecting the country’s aggressive approach to post-presidency accountability.

South Korea’s constitution allows for emergency powers under specific circumstances, but strict safeguards are in place. Parliament retains the authority to override a martial law declaration, which it exercised swiftly during Yoon’s attempt.

The rapid mobilization of lawmakers and mass public demonstrations highlighted the country’s deeply rooted democratic culture, even amid political turmoil.

International observers are closely watching the appeals process. As one of Asia’s most vibrant democracies and a key U.S. ally, South Korea’s handling of the case could have ripple effects for executive power debates across the region.

For now, the verdict stands as a dramatic reminder that even the highest office in the land remains subject to constitutional limits.

For more global political coverage and analysis, share this article or subscribe to our newsletter for updates.