Soros D.A. Takes Legal Action to Halt Musk PAC’s $1 Million Contest

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat closely backed by billionaire George Soros, has launched a legal attack against Elon Musk’s America PAC over a $1 million-a-day giveaway. This initiative offers a daily prize to individuals who sign a petition supporting core constitutional rights particularly the First and Second Amendments. Krasner claims the giveaway amounts to an “unlawful lottery,” despite its goal of increasing voter turnout in swing states where control of the presidency could hinge on every vote.

Here’s what you need to know about Musk’s initiative and Krasner’s pushback:

• The Giveaway’s Mechanism: America PAC is selecting a single winner each day from signers of its petition who are registered voters. To qualify, participants must sign a pledge backing the First and Second Amendments, with winners chosen from crucial swing states.

• Driving Voter Registration: America PAC’s efforts appear to be successfully boosting Republican voter registration in Pennsylvania and other battleground states, a development Democrats seem eager to block.

• Allegations of Partisanship: Krasner’s suit alleges that winners are not randomly selected but instead skew toward attendees at Trump rallies, suggesting political bias rather than pure chance.

The Biden administration’s Justice Department has taken Krasner’s complaint to heart, sending Musk a warning letter last week. The DOJ claims that the daily giveaway “might violate federal laws” against paying people to vote. However, the legality remains murky, with legal experts noting that this situation ventures into “new legal territory.”

Critics argue that the DOJ’s warnings and Krasner’s suit are attempts to squelch conservative voter turnout. With Musk’s initiative driving more Republican registrations, Democrats fear the turnout effect in states like Pennsylvania, where the presidential race could be decided by razor-thin margins.

Recent actions by the Biden administration add fuel to the argument of a broader anti-conservative agenda. Earlier this month, the administration sued Virginia to prevent the removal of non-citizens from its voter rolls, a move Democrats traditionally supported. By preventing basic election integrity measures, it’s no surprise they’d turn their sights on Musk, whose initiative has the potential to swing voter momentum in the GOP’s favor.

Even legal experts admit the novelty of the case. John Fortier of the American Enterprise Institute pointed out the uncertainty, explaining, “It’s a little unclear whether it goes over the line or not.” Stanford Law professor Nate Persily echoed this sentiment, stating that America PAC’s approach brings up questions that have rarely, if ever, been tested in court. “The relevant legal question is whether this is payment to induce people to register,” he added, suggesting the answer would be the defining factor.

Others suggest Musk’s campaign is simply a way to collect contacts for mobilization and outreach legal, commonplace, and perfectly in line with both the spirit and the letter of the law. Michael Morse of the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School finds it unlikely the DOJ would prioritize stopping Musk, suggesting they might have more pressing matters on their plate this close to Election Day.

With the legal lines blurred and Democrats scrambling to limit Musk’s influence, one thing is clear: conservative turnout in swing states is under fire, and the Democratic machine will stop at nothing to keep control. If Krasner’s lawsuit succeeds, it could mark the beginning of a new crackdown on innovative voter mobilization efforts by conservatives.

Share this article or subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated as Election Day approaches.