Reza Pahlavi Calls For US Action As Iran Regime Weakens

As tensions rise in the Middle East, a powerful voice from Iran’s past is urging decisive American leadership. The son of the last shah says the time for half-measures is over. With Iran’s regime wobbling under internal pressure, he believes U.S. action could tip the balance in favor of freedom.

The exiled son of Iran’s toppled monarch, made headlines over the weekend when he called for potential U.S. military intervention against Iran’s ruling clerics. Speaking in an interview with Pahlavi argued that decisive action could ultimately save lives and accelerate the collapse of a regime he says is already on the brink.

Pahlavi’s remarks come as the Trump administration weighs its next steps amid stalled nuclear negotiations and mounting instability inside Iran. For years, the Islamic Republic has tightened its grip on dissent. But the cracks are showing.

Iran has been rocked by waves of protests in recent years, including mass demonstrations that began in late December over economic hardship. What started in the Grand Bazaar in quickly spread nationwide, revealing widespread anger at corruption, inflation, and repression.

The government’s response was swift and brutal:

• Thousands of protesters arrested in mass crackdowns

• Reports of intimidation campaigns targeting activists

• The bloodiest unrest since the 1979 revolution

Iran’s economy is also buckling. Inflation has hovered around 40 percent in recent years, devastating working families. Youth unemployment has been estimated at over 20 percent, fueling frustration among a generation with little hope for opportunity. Meanwhile, Iran continues to pour resources into proxy conflicts across the Middle East rather than addressing domestic suffering.

Pahlavi believes the regime’s weakness presents a rare strategic opening.

“It’s a matter of time,” he said, suggesting that external pressure potentially including military force could accelerate what he sees as the inevitable downfall of the clerical establishment that took power after the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

While critics on the left warn against escalation, President has signaled that patience with Tehran is not unlimited. After years of failed diplomacy under previous administrations, Trump’s approach has centered on leverage and strength.

The United States has already amassed military assets in the region as talks continue. U.S. and Iranian diplomats recently met in an effort to explore the possibility of a new nuclear agreement. Yet Iranian leaders have continued to stall while advancing their nuclear capabilities.

According to recent reports, U.S. military planners are preparing for the possibility of a sustained operation should Trump give the order. Speaking to troops in Trump acknowledged that Iran has been difficult in negotiations and suggested that projecting strength may be necessary to secure peace.

History offers context here. When Trump withdrew from the flawed Iran nuclear deal in 2018, critics predicted chaos. Instead, Iran’s oil revenues plummeted, cutting off billions in funding for its regional ambitions. In 2020, the targeted strike on Qasem Soleimani demonstrated that deterrence backed by action can reshape the strategic landscape overnight.

One undeniable challenge is that Iran’s opposition remains fragmented. Monarchists who back Pahlavi, reformists, and other factions lack unified leadership inside the country. Even Trump himself has expressed skepticism in the past about how much support Pahlavi commands within Iran.

Yet dissatisfaction with the regime is widespread. Independent surveys conducted outside Iran suggest that a significant portion of Iranians favor secular governance and reject the current theocratic system. Social media blackouts and censorship cannot fully mask that reality.

Pahlavi’s argument is straightforward: if the regime is already weakening, a show of American resolve could shorten the conflict and reduce long-term bloodshed.

“Intervention is a way to save lives,” he said, framing potential action not as aggression but as strategic acceleration of change already underway.

This debate is not just about Iran. It is about American credibility. A nuclear-armed Iran would fundamentally alter the balance of power in the Middle East, embolden terrorist proxies, and threaten U.S. allies including Israel and Gulf partners.

Under the current geopolitical climate, weakness invites provocation. Strength compels recalculation.

With 2024 shaping up as a defining election year, foreign policy leadership will be front and center. Republicans argue that the current administration’s softness has emboldened adversaries from Tehran to Beijing. By contrast, Trump’s supporters believe his record shows that deterrence works when America speaks clearly and acts decisively.

Whether intervention ultimately occurs remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the Iranian regime is under strain, its people are restless, and the world is watching how Washington responds.

If you believe strong leadership matters, share this article or subscribe to our newsletter for more updates.