Obama Admits Los Angeles Homelessness Crisis Is Political Failure

When even Barack Obama admits Los Angeles homelessness is an “atrocity,” you know the crisis has reached a breaking point.

Speaking recently about the Los Angeles homelessness crisis, the former president acknowledged what everyday Californians have been saying for years: in a state as wealthy as California, the sight of sprawling tent encampments and people living on sidewalks is indefensible. Yet the uncomfortable question remains who has been running California while this humanitarian disaster unfolded?

During a conversation with a popular online commentator, Obama described the Los Angeles homelessness crisis in stark moral terms.

He said it is “morally ethically speaking an atrocity” that in a wealthy country, people are living on the streets. He also conceded what frustrated residents have long argued: the average person does not want to navigate around tent cities in the middle of downtown.

“That’s a losing political strategy,” Obama admitted.

That statement may be the most revealing part. For years, critics of Democratic leadership in California have warned that ignoring public frustration over crime, encampments, and declining quality of life would backfire. Now even Obama appears to recognize that unlimited tolerance without accountability alienates voters.

Here’s what makes the Los Angeles homelessness crisis so stunning California has already spent staggering sums trying to fix it.

Since 2018, California has allocated more than $20 billion toward homelessness programs and housing initiatives. Los Angeles County alone has directed billions more into supportive housing and services. And yet:

• Los Angeles County’s homeless population has hovered around 75,000 people in recent counts.

• California is home to roughly 30% of the nation’s homeless population despite having only about 12% of the U.S. population.

• The state has some of the highest housing costs in the country, with median home prices exceeding $800,000 in many regions.

Governor Gavin Newsom recently touted a 9% statewide drop in homelessness, pointing to new investments in shelters, mental health reforms, and encampment removals. His office insists California is building a “model” for the nation.

But for business owners boarding up storefronts and families stepping around open-air drug use, the Los Angeles homelessness crisis hardly feels like a success story.

To Obama’s credit, he acknowledged something progressive policymakers often avoid: accountability matters.

He warned that simply declaring homelessness “not their fault” and allowing individuals to “do whatever they want” is a losing political strategy. That’s a subtle but significant departure from the activist wing of the Democratic Party, which has often resisted enforcement measures or mandatory treatment programs.

The reality is that many Americans including many Californians support compassionate solutions. But compassion without structure has produced chaos.

A 2024 statewide poll found that a majority of California voters support clearing encampments if shelter beds are available. Another survey showed strong bipartisan backing for stronger mental health intervention laws. Voters are signaling that they want solutions that balance care with public order.

Yet for decades, California has been governed by one-party rule. Democrats have held the governor’s office since 2011 and maintain supermajorities in the state legislature. If the Los Angeles homelessness crisis is an atrocity, it unfolded under policies designed, funded, and defended by Democratic leadership.

Obama’s warning about a “losing political strategy” may be less about morality and more about political survival. As voters grow increasingly frustrated with rising costs of living, public safety concerns, and visible disorder, the homelessness crisis has become symbolic of broader governance failures.

The median rent in Los Angeles now exceeds $2,700 per month. Inflation over the past four years has raised basic living expenses nationwide. Meanwhile, billions earmarked for homelessness have produced results that many residents struggle to see.

Americans are generous people. They want fewer people sleeping on sidewalks. They want mental health systems that work. They want communities that are safe and functional.

But they also want accountability for how their tax dollars are spent.

Obama’s remarks highlight an uncomfortable truth for his party: moral outrage is not a substitute for effective policy. If the Los Angeles homelessness crisis is indeed an atrocity, then the public deserves answers about how billions were spent and why the streets still tell a different story.

As 2024 and beyond approach, voters may decide that acknowledging failure is not enough. They may demand leadership willing to confront the problem honestly, enforce the law consistently, and protect both the vulnerable and the broader community.

Share this article and subscribe to our newsletter for more updates.