Obama’s DHS Chief Backs Trump’s National Security Picks: Gabbard and Hegseth

In a surprising turn, Jeh Johnson, who served as Homeland Security Secretary under President Obama, publicly defended two of President-elect Donald Trump’s controversial choices for high-profile national security roles: Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense.

During an appearance on CNN News Central, Johnson pushed back against the Democrat-media narrative, offering measured support for Gabbard and Hegseth despite the relentless criticism both have faced from the left. While Johnson made clear his disagreement with some of Trump’s other selections particularly for Attorney General he recognized the strengths these candidates bring to their respective roles.

Defending Tulsi Gabbard

When host Sara Sidner questioned Gabbard’s suitability, citing claims that she has propagated “Russian propaganda” and questioned intelligence on chemical weapons in Syria, Johnson did not mince words.

“I don’t think it is an absolute prerequisite that the Director of National Intelligence be someone from the intelligence community,” Johnson explained. He added that it is often essential for policymakers to approach intelligence with skepticism, citing the flawed intelligence leading up to the Iraq War as a prime example.

This perspective dismantles the left’s attacks on Gabbard as a liability, framing her critical stance on intelligence as potentially beneficial for avoiding groupthink and ensuring accountability within the intelligence apparatus.

Backing Pete Hegseth

Sidner then turned to Pete Hegseth, reducing the Army veteran’s distinguished military career to his role as a “Fox anchor.” She questioned Johnson’s previous comments supporting Hegseth despite his advocacy for accused war criminals and controversial statements about women in combat.

Johnson remained steadfast in his defense: “Here’s somebody who was well-educated, obviously intelligent, was in financial services, was in the Wall Street community for a while, could have made a lot of money and chose to leave that, put on the uniform of our country, and see combat.”

Hegseth’s service speaks for itself. With 20 years in the military, including deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantanamo Bay, as well as two Bronze Stars to his name, he is clearly qualified to lead the Department of Defense. Johnson’s acknowledgment reinforces the point that Hegseth’s experience on the ground gives him a unique perspective sorely lacking in many of Washington’s decision-makers.

A Rational Perspective

While Johnson urged the Senate to thoroughly vet both nominees during their confirmation hearings, his comments highlight a broader issue: the left’s reflexive opposition to anything associated with Trump. Gabbard and Hegseth are individuals with proven track records of service and independent thinking, yet they are attacked for their willingness to challenge the establishment.

Trump’s administration promises to prioritize national security with bold, unorthodox appointments, and Johnson’s tempered approval of these picks underscores their merit. As America faces mounting global challenges, it’s time to move past partisan bickering and evaluate leaders based on their qualifications and ability to deliver results.

Let’s ensure more people hear about the real stakes in these debates. Share this article and subscribe for updates as we fight for America’s future.