Public Frustration Grows Over NYT's 'Battle-Tested' Label for Hunter Biden

The New York Times is facing a storm of criticism after publishing what many are calling a sympathetic portrayal of Hunter Biden, just hours after his conviction on several felony gun charges. The article, written by Katie Rogers, praised the "battle-tested" relationship between President Joe Biden and his son, sparking outrage among readers who viewed the piece as overly sympathetic.

Hunter Biden was found guilty on three felony counts: lying to a federally licensed firearms dealer, making false claims on a federal firearms background check form, and possessing an illegally obtained firearm. Despite the gravity of these charges, the NYT article focused on the emotional strain this has placed on President Biden.

The piece began with a dramatic recounting of Hunter Biden waiting for his father on the tarmac, shortly after the conviction. "He had just been convicted on three felony gun charges by a jury in Wilmington, Del., his hometown. His father had hastily rearranged his schedule and rushed up from Washington," Rogers wrote, setting the scene of a poignant family moment.

Within hours of the verdict, President Biden was described as embracing his son and other family members in a show of support. "To call the relationship between father and son battle tested is an understatement," Rogers added, prompting backlash for what many saw as an attempt to evoke sympathy for the Bidens.

Critics quickly took to social media to voice their discontent:

• Jonathan Levine of the New York Post remarked, "NYT coverage of Hunter Biden truly unbelievable."

• Another critic added, "The NYT is transcribing a screenplay on behalf of the White House communication team. This is not tongue in cheek; this is literally what they are doing."

• Ian Miller chimed in, "In case you’re wondering whether or not the New York Times has any shame or sense of embarrassment left, this disgrace confirms that answer is a resounding no."

• Steve Guest simply called the article "Embarrassing to say the least."

The criticism centered on the perception that the New York Times was more interested in portraying the Bidens in a positive light than in providing an objective account of the serious legal issues at hand. Many saw the piece as a blatant attempt to downplay the significance of Hunter Biden’s convictions and the potential legal consequences he faces.

As Hunter Biden awaits sentencing, with the possibility of up to 25 years in prison and $750,000 in fines, the backlash against the New York Times highlights the growing frustration among Americans who feel that media bias continues to shape public perception. The incident underscores the need for balanced and unbiased journalism, especially in politically charged cases involving high-profile figures.

Share this article or subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed on the latest developments.