Mamdani Proposes 127 Billion Budget With Property Tax Hike and Reserve Drawdown

New York City’s $127 billion preliminary budget proposal is setting off alarm bells across the five boroughs.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani unveiled a sweeping 2027 spending plan aimed at closing a projected $5.4 billion deficit. But his solution raising property taxes by 9.5% and drawing down nearly $1.2 billion from city reserves is already drawing fierce criticism from fiscal watchdogs and city officials.

At a time when inflation has squeezed household budgets nationwide, the Mamdani budget property tax proposal would directly impact homeowners and renters alike in America’s largest city.

Under the proposal, property taxes would rise by 9.5%. Mamdani acknowledged that such an increase would effectively hit working- and middle-class New Yorkers, noting a median household income of roughly $122,000 in the city.

Property taxes are New York City’s single largest revenue source, generating more than $30 billion annually. An across-the-board increase would ripple through:

• Homeowners facing higher annual bills.

• Renters potentially seeing pass-through costs.

• Small businesses already grappling with high operating expenses.

City Comptroller Mark Levine warned that the property tax system is “profoundly unfair and inconsistent,” adding that a broad increase would be regressive.

In addition to raising taxes, the Mamdani budget property tax framework would draw:

• $980 million from the city’s Rainy Day Fund.

• $229 million from the Retiree Health Benefits Trust.

Reserve funds are traditionally meant for economic downturns or emergencies. New York City last tapped major reserves during the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic periods marked by steep revenue declines and economic contraction.

This time, however, reserves would be used despite what officials describe as a strong economy and record Wall Street revenues.

Fiscal analysts caution that using reserves to cover recurring structural deficits can trigger concerns among credit rating agencies. A downgrade of New York City’s municipal bonds could raise borrowing costs, increasing debt service expenses in future budgets.

Mamdani’s proposed $127 billion budget represents a $12 billion increase over former Mayor Eric Adams’ $115 billion spending plan.

The mayor attributes the shortfall to what he calls $7.54 billion in underfunded obligations across six areas, including:

• Cash assistance programs.

• Rental assistance.

• Shelter and housing support.

• Legal settlements and judgments.

• Structural subsidy deficits.

New York City has been legally required to pass a balanced budget since the Financial Emergency Act of 1975, enacted after the city nearly defaulted on its debt. The law was designed to prevent reliance on short-term borrowing for day-to-day operations a practice that brought the city to the brink of bankruptcy in the 1970s.

Another major factor weighing on the city’s finances is the cost of housing and caring for undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers.

The Citizens Budget Commission reports that more than $7 billion in taxpayer funds has been spent on migrant-related services in recent years. According to local reporting, the annual budget for asylum seekers now exceeds the budgets of the city’s health department, sanitation department, and fire department.

These expenditures have intensified debate over whether federal and state governments should shoulder a larger share of the burden.

Mamdani has signaled that he would prefer raising taxes on high-income earners and corporations but doing so requires approval from Governor Kathy Hochul and the state legislature. Hochul has pledged not to raise taxes in 2026, limiting the mayor’s immediate options.

Without Albany’s cooperation, the Mamdani budget property tax increase appears to be the primary lever available to close the deficit.

New York City’s economy remains heavily tied to financial markets. While Wall Street revenues have rebounded strongly, market volatility could quickly reverse that trend.

Key risks include:

• Potential credit rating downgrades if reserves are depleted.

• Higher borrowing costs if investor confidence weakens.

• Increased strain on homeowners and renters amid high living costs.

• Structural imbalances if recurring expenses outpace revenue growth.

New York City already carries tens of billions of dollars in outstanding municipal debt. Rising interest rates have made borrowing more expensive nationwide, compounding fiscal pressures.

The debate now centers on whether raising property taxes and tapping reserves is prudent fiscal management or a warning sign of deeper structural imbalance.

As budget negotiations move forward, New Yorkers will be watching closely. The city’s history shows that fiscal discipline matters. The question is whether this proposal strengthens stability or pushes the problem into the future.

Share this article and subscribe to our newsletter for more updates.