Kamala Harris Spent $2.5 Million On Oprah Interview

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign spent nearly $2.5 million on a September town hall event hosted by Oprah Winfrey, according to a new report, far surpassing the $1 million initially reported. The lavish expenditure for the production, which included appearances by Hollywood stars like Meryl Streep, has sparked scrutiny over the campaign’s extravagant spending habits.

Two sources revealed to The New York Times that Harpo Productions, Winfrey’s company, received nearly $2.5 million to handle the event. The high cost reportedly covered set design, lighting, cameras, crew, and other production needs even down to the furniture used for the sit-down interview.

Winfrey defended the expense in a social media post, emphasizing she personally received no payment. “For the live-streaming event, my production company Harpo was asked to bring in set design, lights, cameras, crew, producers, and every other item necessary... I did not take any personal fee,” she stated.

While the stars who appeared alongside Harris, including Lady Gaga and Katy Perry, were not directly paid for their performances, their production teams were compensated, adding to the ballooning campaign costs.

• Harris’ campaign reportedly spent $1.5 billion over just 15 weeks.

• The campaign’s pre-election concerts and rallies cost over $10 million.

• A single podcast interview on Call Her Daddy required a six-figure sum to construct a custom set in a D.C. hotel, designed to mimic the original set in Los Angeles.

These staggering figures dwarf the estimated $354 million spent by the Trump campaign, raising concerns about how Harris’ team managed funds and whether such expenses reflect the priorities of her potential leadership.

The Harris campaign’s extravagant spending raises deeper questions about accountability and judgment. Federal Election Commission filings reveal that, by October, the campaign had already spent $880 million, an amount that seems astronomical compared to more fiscally restrained campaigns.

Critics argue that such expenditures are out of touch with average Americans, especially as the country grapples with economic challenges like inflation and skyrocketing living costs. While glitzy productions and celebrity endorsements may add flair, they do little to convince voters that a candidate is serious about addressing the real issues facing everyday citizens.

For a campaign that consistently polls poorly on issues like leadership and economic vision, Harris’ spending spree is unlikely to inspire confidence. Flashy celebrity events may generate media buzz, but they highlight the glaring disconnect between Harris’ priorities and the struggles of American families.

The Vice President’s financial decisions will soon come under further scrutiny when the post-election financial disclosure is released in accordance with federal law. Until then, voters are left wondering: What does all this spending really accomplish, and at what cost?

Share this article and subscribe to our newsletter for updates on campaign spending and election news.