Jay Jones Faces Police Union Backlash After Alleged Callous Remark

Jerrauld “Jay” Jones, the Democratic nominee for Virginia attorney general, is under growing pressure after a former legislative colleague told reporters Jones once suggested that if more police officers were killed, they would “move on, not shooting people.” The allegation, made public this week, arrived amid earlier revelations of violent text messages Jones sent in 2022 about a political opponent.

That allegation prompted the Virginia Fraternal Order of Police to call on Jones to withdraw from the attorney general contest immediately, saying his alleged rhetoric and past messages are incompatible with the responsibilities of the state's top prosecutor. The FOP’s letter bluntly stated the union finds any suggestion of political violence unacceptable and described Jones as unfit for office.

What makes the story combustible

• Carrie Coyner, a Republican delegate, told Virginia Scope she heard Jones make the comment during a 2020 conversation about qualified immunity and officer safety. Coyner also shared screenshots of 2022 messages in which Jones joked about political violence toward then–House Speaker Todd Gilbert comments Jones has since denied.

• Gov. Glenn Youngkin publicly demanded Jones exit the race, calling the messages “beyond disqualifying.” Other statewide Republicans joined the chorus of condemnation, while many high-level Democrats have stayed publicly quiet.

Context that matters

Public trust in prosecutors and in public discussion about law enforcement is fragile. The debate over qualified immunity and officer accountability has been intense, but the stakes are also real on the ground: federal data show 118 law enforcement officers were killed in the line of duty in 2022, 60 of those deaths resulting from felonious acts. In 2021, the FBI reported 129 officers killed in the line of duty, 73 of them felonious. That background is why statements touching on harm to officers trigger immediate outrage.

Additional perspective from memorial and fatality tracking groups reinforces the seriousness of officer deaths: the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial notes there are more than 23,700 names engraved on the memorial, and recent annual tallies show hundreds of officers still perish in the line of duty across cause-of-death categories. Those numbers are routinely cited by unions and lawmakers when arguing for policies that protect patrol officers and prosecutors alike.

Jones’s response and political fallout

Jones has denied telling Coyner the alleged comment and said he “did not say this” and does not wish harm to law enforcement, pledging to work with officers if elected attorney general. Nonetheless, the FOP’s demand that he step aside complicates the Democratic ticket in a tightly watched Virginia election year and gives Republicans material for attack ads and stump speeches.

Why voters and legal observers care

• The attorney general enforces laws and decides whether to bring or drop serious criminal charges; questions about judgment and temperament are therefore central to the race.

• Public confidence in prosecutions depends on the perception that the AG will rise above partisan rancor and will not condone or encourage violence in rhetoric.

• Parties typically react differently to scandals; the silence or tepid responses from some Democratic leaders have become a talking point about accountability and standards for public office.

What this means going forward

This controversy has immediate campaign implications it’s now a line item for ads and talking points for both sides and it raises larger questions about how political figures’ private messages should influence eligibility for public office. With early voting already underway in some jurisdictions and the race drawing national attention, officials and voters will be watching whether Jones sustains his candidacy or whether party leaders push for a replacement. Recent reporting indicates that reactions have ranged from calls for immediate withdrawal to cautious calls for accountability without asking for his exit.

Bottom line: whether these particular allegations are disputed, the combination of inflammatory private messages and an alleged comment about harm to officers has united law enforcement groups, some high-profile state leaders, and many voters in calling for a swift and transparent resolution that protects public trust in the attorney general’s office.

Please share and subscribe to our newsletter for more coverage.