Israel’s Qatar Strike Was Legal and Necessary

Once again, the United Nations is proving that when it comes to Israel, it plays by a very different set of rules.

This week, the UN Security Council condemned Israel for its recent strike against senior Hamas leaders operating in Qatar a nation that has long served as a luxurious safe haven for some of the world’s most wanted terrorists. The outrage from the international community is predictable. But legally? Completely baseless.

Israel’s strike was not just justified it was entirely legal under the same international framework the UN itself helped create following the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Here’s the bottom line: A country that harbors terrorists becomes a legitimate part of the threat.

For decades, it was assumed that only sovereign States could commit “armed attacks” under Article 51 of the UN Charter, which outlines the right to self-defense. But that idea was shattered after 9/11, when the entire world watched a non-State terrorist group bring down the Twin Towers and kill nearly 3,000 Americans. In response, the UN passed Resolution 1368, which reaffirmed the inherent right to self-defense even against terrorist groups operating across borders.

More importantly, Resolution 1373 went even further, declaring it illegal for any State to “harbor” terrorists and demanding that countries “deny safe haven” to those who finance, plan, or commit terrorist acts.

Sound familiar?

Qatar has done exactly what 1373 prohibits. It has allowed Hamas leaders responsible for the October 7 massacre of over 1,200 Israeli civilians, countless rocket attacks, and ongoing hostage operations to live and operate freely inside its borders. Israel’s response was not a reckless escalation; it was a targeted and proportionate act of self-defense.

This isn’t some fringe legal theory. The doctrine of denying terrorist safe havens has been used by the United States, France, India, Russia, and Turkey for over two decades:

• The U.S. cited it in its war against the Taliban for harboring al-Qaeda.

• France invoked it for counterterrorism operations across North Africa.

• India justified strikes inside Pakistan against groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba.

• Turkey launched operations in Iraq against the PKK.

If the international community accepts these actions as lawful which it has it cannot suddenly pretend Israel is uniquely violating international norms by doing the same.

Critics claim that the strike violated Qatar’s sovereignty. But sovereignty is not a shield for terror. When a State refuses to stop terrorists within its borders, and those terrorists continue to launch attacks, that State becomes complicit and it loses the protections sovereignty would normally offer.

And let’s be clear: This was not a carpet bombing. It was a surgical strike on senior terrorist operatives, carried out with precision and intelligence to avoid civilian casualties a standard that many Western powers, including the U.S., have failed to meet in their own overseas operations.

What Israel did in Qatar wasn’t just legal it was necessary. Failure to act would mean allowing Hamas leadership to continue plotting from the comfort of five-star hotels, while Israeli civilians live under daily threat of rocket fire and terror tunnels.

As President George W. Bush declared after 9/11, “We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.” That is not merely a moral statement it’s a legal one, codified by the very UN that now dares to lecture Israel.

Once again, the international community reveals its hypocrisy. When America strikes terrorists abroad, it’s called self-defense. When Israel does it, it’s called aggression.

Israel is not required to sit on its hands while its enemies regroup in foreign capitals. And the world has no right to demand it do so.

The right to self-defense means the right to eliminate a threat even if that threat is sipping espresso in a Qatari hotel.

Share this article or subscribe to our newsletter for updates with someone who still believes the UN plays fair when it comes to Israel.