State Supreme Court Reinstates Georgia Heartbeat Bill

The Georgia Supreme Court has reinstated the state’s “LIFE Act,” which bans most abortions after six weeks, when a fetal heartbeat can be detected. The ruling comes after a Fulton County judge temporarily struck down the law, calling it “arbitrary,” but the Supreme Court’s decision allows the pro-life legislation to stand while the appeal is heard.

Six judges sided with the state in their ruling, while one judge offered a partial concurrence, and two did not participate. The LIFE Act, first signed into law by Governor Brian Kemp in 2018, is now officially back in effect as of 5:00 p.m. Monday.

Pro-life groups across Georgia praised the court’s decision. “Thank you Governor Kemp and Attorney General Christopher Carr for your unwavering dedication to protecting the youngest Georgians,” posted Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America on X. The law protects unborn babies as early as six weeks into pregnancy, when their heart, brain, spinal cord, and limbs begin to develop.

However, abortion advocates were quick to decry the ruling. Planned Parenthood labeled the decision as “devastating,” claiming, “Georgians deserve better. Every person should be able to get the care they need.”

The LIFE Act’s reinstatement follows Fulton County Judge Robert McBurney’s recent decision to block the law, in which he argued that a woman’s “liberty” in Georgia includes “the power to control her own body” and rejected state interference in healthcare choices. His ruling echoed pro-abortion sentiment that abortion should be allowed up until fetal viability the point at which a baby could survive outside the womb.

But McBurney’s ruling was short-lived. The Supreme Court’s decision to reinstate the bill came despite a wave of misleading stories that attempted to blame the law for the deaths of two women. In one case, a woman died after taking abortion pills that left the remains of twins inside her womb. Pro-abortion advocates suggested the law might have prevented her from receiving proper care, but pro-life groups countered that the LIFE Act would not have interfered with the removal of the already deceased babies.

Key takeaways from the ruling:

• The LIFE Act protects unborn babies as early as six weeks, when key developmental milestones occur.

• The ruling keeps the law in place while an appeal is heard regarding the law’s constitutionality.

• Pro-abortion groups argue that the ruling threatens women's healthcare, while pro-life advocates see it as a victory for unborn children.

With Georgia expected to be a pivotal battleground state in the 2024 election, this ruling is likely to energize both sides of the abortion debate. Democrats have already made it clear that they plan to push for a national abortion guarantee, setting the stage for an intense legal and political battle over the issue.

Share this article or subscribe to our newsletter for more updates.