Gov. Sanders, Conservatives Criticize Democratic SOTU Counterprogramming

While President Trump outlined a vision for a stronger, safer, more prosperous America during his State of the Union address, parts of the Democratic Party were busy hosting what can only be described as political performance art.

Instead of attending the speech, dozens of Democrats opted for counterprogramming events with names like “State of the Swamp” and the “People’s State of the Union.” One gathering featured activists dressed in frog and giraffe costumes, attacking ICE and hurling insults at the president.

The imagery quickly went viral and so did the backlash.

Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders didn’t mince words. The difference, she said, isn’t right versus left. It’s “normal vs crazy.”

Her response captured what many Americans were already thinking.

As addressed the nation, outlining plans focused on border security, economic growth, and American strength abroad, prominent Democrats chose to boycott or protest.

At the so-called “State of the Swamp” event, far-left activists including members of the Portland Frog Brigade appeared on stage in animal costumes alongside Democratic Rep. Maxine Dexter. Another protester dressed as a giraffe criticized immigration enforcement and mocked the president.

Conservatives across social media were stunned.

• Called the spectacle “weird.”

• Commentators questioned who in Democratic leadership thought this was a winning strategy.

• Republican accounts pointed out that instead of offering a substantive rebuttal, Democrats appeared to be aligning with fringe activists.

The contrast was sharp. On one side, a formal address to the nation. On the other, costumed theatrics.

The counter-events were organized by progressive groups including MoveOn and co-hosted by the Midas Touch Network. Several House and Senate Democrats skipped the State of the Union entirely, claiming the speech would be filled with “lie after lie.”

Outside the Capitol, in freezing temperatures, lawmakers joined activists criticizing immigration enforcement and federal agencies. Some even demanded funding be cut to the Department of Homeland Security unless enforcement policies changed.

This is happening at a time when:

• Border encounters surged above 2 million in a recent fiscal year, straining federal and local resources.

• A majority of Americans consistently report believing the country is on the “wrong track,” according to national polling averages.

• Violent crime concerns remain top-of-mind for voters in major metropolitan areas.

Rather than address those anxieties directly, Democrats appeared to double down on protest politics.

Politics is often about optics as much as policy. And the optics of elected officials standing beside activists in frog and giraffe costumes while the president addresses the nation are difficult to ignore.

Even Americans who disagree with Trump on policy might reasonably expect a level of decorum during a State of the Union. Historically, members of both parties attended the address as a recognition of the office itself even during times of sharp disagreement.

Instead, what voters saw this week reinforced a growing perception gap between the parties.

Sanders highlighted that while Trump honored patriotic Americans and laid out policy goals, Democrats offered heckling, boycotts, and what she described as a “bizarre dress-up show.”

For swing voters heading into the 2024 election cycle, that contrast could prove significant.

The phrase “normal vs crazy” may sound blunt, but it reflects a broader frustration among voters who feel political activism has overtaken serious governance.

At a moment when Americans are worried about inflation, border security, global instability, and economic opportunity, they are watching closely to see which party appears focused and which appears distracted.

Trump’s supporters argue he is offering strength and direction. Critics argue he is divisive. But even many moderates struggle to see how costume protests and boycott theatrics present a compelling alternative.

In an election year that will likely hinge on turnout and perception, moments like this matter.

If Democrats hope to win over skeptical voters, they may need more than counterprogramming and costumes.

Share this article or subscribe to our newsletter for more updates.