- Conservative Fix
- Posts
- CDC Vaccine Panel Walks Back Blanket COVID Shot Recommendation
CDC Vaccine Panel Walks Back Blanket COVID Shot Recommendation
MMRV delayed, COVID shots made optional, and Hep B at birth under fire as new voices reshape vaccine policy.

In a major shift, the CDC’s powerful vaccine advisory panel has quietly reversed course on several high-profile vaccine recommendations including COVID-19 shots, the MMRV vaccine, and the controversial hepatitis B dose given at birth.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which has long operated as the behind-the-scenes engine driving U.S. vaccine policy, made several key decisions during its recent two-day meeting. And for once, not every jab was rubber-stamped.
Here’s what the panel decided:
COVID Vaccines: No longer universally recommended. The panel now says the decision to get the COVID shot should be left to “individual decision-making” in consultation with a provider. This shift moves away from sweeping mandates and toward personal choice a win for medical freedom advocates who have long demanded autonomy over experimental injections.
MMRV Vaccine: ACIP voted to delay this combination vaccine (which covers measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella/chickenpox) until children are at least 4 years old. The reason? An increased risk of febrile seizures a concern long dismissed by officials until now. Notably, the individual MMR and varicella shots are still recommended earlier, just not bundled.
Hepatitis B Vaccine at Birth: While a vote to delay the shot was postponed, the issue remains contentious. Critics argue that if a mother tests negative for Hep B a disease typically spread through sex or blood the newborn dose is unnecessary. ACIP did vote to require all pregnant women be tested for Hep B, a test covered by insurance.
These aren’t just procedural tweaks they mark a turning point.
And it's no coincidence that this comes just months after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took the dramatic step of firing all sitting ACIP members, citing “conflicts of interest” and accusing the panel of functioning as a “rubber-stamp for pharma.” Kennedy’s criticisms included:
ACIP “never recommended against a vaccine even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.”
The panel “failed to scrutinize products given to babies and pregnant women.”
ACIP had “lost the trust of the American people.”
With five new appointees now on the panel including physicians and scientists with real-world, clinical experience the committee finally appears to be embracing some level of critical oversight, rather than blindly pushing every product that crosses their desk.
This matters. ACIP doesn’t just advise it determines what vaccines your child is told to receive, what insurance is forced to cover, and which shots are pushed through public health programs. For years, the panel’s influence has shaped the CDC’s one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule, often without meaningful debate.
But that era may finally be changing.
In a country where trust in public health institutions has plummeted with recent polls showing fewer than 40% of Americans trust the CDC’s vaccine guidance a shift toward transparency and individual choice isn’t just welcome. It’s necessary.
Let’s hope this is the start of a long-overdue course correction, not a one-off concession.
Send this to someone who still believes every CDC recommendation is gospel, or subscribe to our newsletter for more real news on health and freedom.