Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes Plea Deals with 9/11 Plotters, Including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

The Biden-Harris administration has negotiated plea deals with three of the five alleged Al Qaeda terrorists detained at Guantanamo Bay for their involvement in the September 11, 2001, attacks. Among those entering plea agreements is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the notorious mastermind behind the attacks, alongside Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

The Department of Defense has refrained from disclosing the specific terms of these plea deals. However, it is confirmed that, in exchange for pleading guilty to all charges, including the murder of 2,976 people, the death penalty has been removed as a possible punishment for these individuals.

“The three accused, along with Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Ramzi Bin al Shibh, were initially charged jointly and arraigned on June 5, 2008, and then were again charged jointly and arraigned a second time on May 5, 2012, in connection with their alleged roles in the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States,” the Pentagon stated.

The decision to forego the death penalty has sparked outrage among the families of 9/11 victims. The Office of Military Commissions (OMC) communicated to these families that the plea deals were made to spare the terrorists from capital punishment.

Jim Smith, a retired police officer whose wife, Moira Smith, was the only female officer who died in the attacks, expressed his dismay. “I feel like I was kicked,” he lamented. “The prosecution and families have waited 23 years to have our day in court to put on the record what these animals did to our loved ones. They took that opportunity away from us. They committed the worst crime in the history of our country; they should receive the highest penalty.”

The September 11 attacks remain the deadliest terrorist assault in history, claiming nearly 3,000 lives and forever altering the landscape of global security. Families of the victims have long sought justice and closure through legal proceedings.

Critics argue that the plea deals may prevent the full scope of the defendants' actions from being publicly aired in court, potentially leaving unanswered questions about the attacks and the individuals responsible.

These developments have reignited debates over the handling of Guantanamo Bay detainees and the administration's broader approach to justice for acts of terrorism. While the plea deals bring an end to prolonged legal proceedings, they leave many families feeling that justice has not been fully served.

Stay informed with the latest updates by subscribing to our newsletter or sharing this article with friends and family.