'60 Minutes' Issues Response to Controversy Over Kamala Harris Interview Editing

CBS News’ 60 Minutes finally addressed the scandal surrounding its deceptive editing of an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. The controversy, which erupted two weeks ago, centered on claims that the show had manipulated Harris’s responses to make her appear more coherent on sensitive topics, particularly U.S. support for Israel.

In a statement aired Sunday night, 60 Minutes attempted to brush off the accusations, claiming that the allegation of deceitful editing was “false.” However, their explanation raised more questions than it answered. According to the show, a longer portion of Harris’s answer had been used on Face the Nation, while 60 Minutes aired a more “succinct” version to save time in their segment.

• Key Issue: CBS has refused to release the full, unedited interview and transcript, which would be the simplest way to address the controversy.

• Trump Campaign Response: Trump's team immediately fired back, accusing CBS of doing exactly what they had been accused of editing out a portion of Harris’s response to make her sound less incoherent.

• Media Transparency: Former CBS journalists, U.S. Senators, and conservative media organizations have called on the network to be transparent, but CBS has remained defiant, only releasing selective parts of the interview.

The moment that sparked the uproar occurred when 60 Minutes host Bill Whitaker questioned Harris about U.S. financial support for Israel amid its ongoing war against genocidal Islamic terrorists. Whitaker posed the question: “But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening.” Harris’s original response, according to a CBS promotional clip, was a confusing statement that never made it to air. Instead, CBS replaced it with a cleaner, more coherent answer from a different section of the interview. The Trump campaign claimed that CBS's selective editing was an attempt to make Harris appear more competent than she actually was.

The network’s refusal to release the full transcript and interview leaves a cloud of suspicion over their actions. Had they done so, they could have cleared their name. Instead, their defensive response further confirmed what Trump and his supporters have been saying for years that the mainstream media, particularly shows like 60 Minutes, are hopelessly biased and cannot be trusted to present the truth.

As Election Day draws near, this scandal serves as another stark reminder of the media's role in shaping public perception and why Trump’s decision to skip their interviews seems justified.

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated on the latest media scandals and more!